Hawai‘i to Receive Over $54M From Tobacco Companies

Listen to this Article
1 minute
Loading Audio... Article will play after ad...
Playing in :00

Acting Attorney General Russell Suzuki announced on Wednesday, March 14, 2018, that the State of Hawai‘i has agreed to a multi-million dollar arbitration settlement with the tobacco industry.

The settlement resolves an ongoing dispute between the tobacco companies and Hawai‘i, relating to compliance with the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) from 2004 to 2017. As part of the settlement, the state expects to receive in excess of $54 million dollars in April 2018 from funds that have been withheld from Hawai‘i during the disputed years.

In 1998, leading United States tobacco manufacturers entered into the MSA with 46 states, including Hawai‘i, and the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In consideration for a release of past, present and certain future claims, the manufacturers agreed to pay substantial monies to the settling states.

The MSA allows for adjustments in calculating the annual payments disbursed to the states. Hawai‘i, along with all of the other states that signed the MSA, has received adjusted annual payments. One such adjustment is the non-participating manufacturer (NPM) adjustment. The monies that are withheld due to the NPM adjustment go into the disputed payment account, which includes Hawai‘i’s portion or monies that Hawai‘i would have received had Hawai‘i prevailed in the diligent enforcement arbitration. The monies in the disputed payment account are at the center of the NPM arbitration, with hundreds of millions of dollars at stake for each contested year.


Hawai‘i joins several other states in entering into the current settlement. Twenty-five other states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia have previously settled with the tobacco industry. The settlement will not only spare Hawai‘i the risk of losing millions of dollars for each disputed year if an adverse ruling is received, but will save the state the expense and uncertainty of protracted litigation— litigation which would likely have lasted several decades.


Sponsored Content

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay in-the-know with daily or weekly
headlines delivered straight to your inbox.


This comments section is a public community forum for the purpose of free expression. Although Big Island Now encourages respectful communication only, some content may be considered offensive. Please view at your own discretion. View Comments