News

Hawai‘i Supreme Court Reinstates Elections Clerk Cases

Play
Listen to this Article
1 minute
Loading Audio... Article will play after ad...
Playing in :00
A
A
A

Hawai‘i Supreme Court. Wiki commons photo.

The Hawai‘i State Supreme Court has unanimously overturned the dismissal of the defamation lawsuit filed by county elections clerk, Patricia Nakamoto and a deputy elections clerk, Shyla Ayau.

The court reversed the Intermediate Court Third Circuit’s dismissal and Intermediate Court of Appeals decision that upheld the dismissal of Nakamoto and Ayau’s case.

In a 48-page decision written by Chief Justice Recktenwald, the court ruled that employees can sue their employers for defamation and damage of their reputation. The court also ruled that private investigators have a legal duty to investigate incidents with accuracy and objectivity.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD

Ted Hong, a Hilo attorney representing Nakamoto and Ayau, said the impact of the decision in the workplace cannot be understated.

“This is an important decision for all employees who need to protect their reputation from malicious employers and co-workers,” Hong said. “The court’s decision will help protect workers in the changing, modern workplace for the next fifty years, at least.”

According to Hong, the court decision puts cases back on track and will hold accountable the individuals who have ruined his clientsʻ reputations.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD

“The time has come for the County to do the right thing,” said Hong. “The question is: will they? Or will they continue to bleed Ms. Nakamoto and Ms. Ayau by forcing them to take their cases to trial?”

Sponsored Content

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay in-the-know with daily or weekly
headlines delivered straight to your inbox.
Cancel
×

Comments

This comments section is a public community forum for the purpose of free expression. Although Big Island Now encourages respectful communication only, some content may be considered offensive. Please view at your own discretion. View Comments