Business

Hawai‘i Joins Coalition to Protect Seniors in Nursing Homes, Care Contracts

Play
Listen to this Article
2 minutes
Loading Audio... Article will play after ad...
Playing in :00
A
A
A

Big Island Now stock photo.

Attorney General Doug Chin and Executive Director of the Office of Consumer Protection Steve Levins announced today that Hawai‘i, together with 16 additional states, submitted comments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, recommending that CMS maintain its rule that prohibits pre-dispute arbitration clauses in nursing home and other long-term care contracts.

“The current rule protects Hawai‘i’s elderly from being taken advantage of by predatory long-term care schemes,” Attorney General Chin said. “The government should protect the elderly and not take away their legal rights.”

In 2015, Hawai‘i and 15 other states submitted comments to CMS in support of a proposed regulation to bar such pre-dispute arbitration clauses in long-term care contracts.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD

The comments noted that, “Pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements in general can be procedurally unfair to consumers and can jeopardize one of the fundamental rights of Americans; the right to be heard and seek judicial redress for our claims. This is especially true when consumers are making the difficult decisions regarding the long-term care of loved ones.”

In October 2016, CMS issued its final rule, prohibiting the use of pre-dispute arbitration clauses in such agreements. CMS specifically cited the comments of the attorneys general in support. On Oct. 17, 2016, the American Health Care Association and a group of affiliated nursing homes filed suit against the regulation in the Northern District of Mississippi, which issued a preliminary injunction against enforcing the prohibition on pre-dispute arbitration clauses. On June 8, 2017, CMS proposed reversing the rule and removing the prohibition on pre-dispute arbitration clauses in long-term care contracts.

The comments filed today urge CMS to maintain the prohibition for the reasons set forth when it issued the regulation.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD

“We believe that the prohibition on pre-dispute arbitration clauses provides an important protection for the consumers of our states at a time when consumers are undertaking a difficult and emotional decision,” the states commented.

Attorney General Chin and Executive Director Levins were joined by the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont and Washington in filing today’s comments.

Sponsored Content

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay in-the-know with daily or weekly
headlines delivered straight to your inbox.
Cancel
×

Comments

This comments section is a public community forum for the purpose of free expression. Although Big Island Now encourages respectful communication only, some content may be considered offensive. Please view at your own discretion. View Comments